The Canadian Conservative government is considering user fees as a way to cut the deficit. The claim that this is not a tax hike is annoying because it is a tax hike. There may be important differences between user fees and higher general tax revenues, but both are still tax increases. If I used to get a service paid for by part of my tax payment and later I have to pay a user fee in addition to paying that part of my taxes, then I have experienced a tax increase.
Jason Zweig explores the epidemic of stock pickers who compare their performance with dividends to the index without dividends. My softball team would be doing better if half of our opponent’s runs didn’t count.
Rob Carrick explains the various practical ways to reduce your dependence on Canada Post.
Ellen Roseman has a story about a credit card company that takes advantage of users who have built up rewards.
Money Smarts explains how to get a guaranteed 20% return with new RESP contributions after your child has started school.
Retire Happy rounds up various opinions on Vanguard’s launch into Canada. Hopefully Vanguard’s investor-friendly practices in the U.S. will carry over to their Canadian operations.
The Blunt Bean Counter explains the interesting conflict between Sino Forrest Corporation and Muddy Waters Research who accuse Sino Forrest of fraud. It’s not clear whether this is a case of fraud or one of deliberate stock manipulation. Blessed by the Potato has also been following this story with a series of posts.
Larry MacDonald analyzes the recent 2011 federal budget.
Big Cajun Man is suspicious of a golf pro’s advice to buy golf lessons and new clubs.
Canadian Capitalist updates his real money mini-portfolio based on TD’s e-series funds. For investors just starting out on a DIY-approach seeing how he handles this portfolio can be instructive.
Preet Banerjee makes the case for measuring your investment returns with an absolute benchmark rather than relative returns to some index.
Million Dollar Journey asks the question of whether one can save too much at the expense of the present. I think the answer is yes, but this applies to extremely few people. Further, my guess is that many people will use the saving-too-much argument to justify their reckless spending.