The subject of foreign workers is heating up in the U.S. right now, and has been a hot topic in Canada in recent years.  Local workers often see foreign workers as cheap labourers who take away their jobs.  Employers see foreign workers as a way to find scarce skills and cut costs.  As is common in debates, both sides are partially right and partially wrong. In a simple but flawed view of the world, there is a fixed set of jobs available in a country, and workers compete for these jobs.  With this way of thinking, when a foreign worker gets a job, that’s one less job available for local workers, and when a foreign worker leaves (or any worker retires), there’s one more job available to local workers. This way of thinking is reasonable for most jobs, but it’s wrong for the most skilled positions.  There are only so many highly skilled people to go around.  These workers help make businesses succeed.  They create more jobs than the one job they occupy....

Recently, Braden Warwick at PWL Capital created an excellent CPP calculator that we can all use.  One of the numbers this calculator reports is the IRR (Internal Rate of Return) you’ll get between your CPP contributions and the CPP pension you’ll collect.  Some financial advisors (but not Braden) decide it makes sense for their clients to take CPP as early as possible (age 60), and invest the proceeds.  Their reasoning is that they believe they can earn a higher return.  Here I explain why this logic compares the wrong returns. The return you’ll get on your CPP contributions depends on the contributions you and your employer have made and the benefits you’ll get.  These amounts depend on many factors about your life as well as some assumptions about the future.  Typically, the return people get on CPP is between inflation+2% and inflation+4%.  (However, it can go higher if you took time off work with a disability or to raise your children.  It al...

Inflation is a risk we have to face in financial planning, particularly in retirement.  We need to measure inflation risk correctly to be able to make reasonable financial plans.  The best guide we have to the future takes into account past inflation statistics.  But the field of statistics is full of subtleties, and even Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) can make mistakes. DFA creates good funds, and their advisors tend to do good work for their clients.  I’d prefer to find errors in the work of a less investor-friendly investment firm, but they provided a clear example to learn from.  They misapplied a statistical rule, and as a result, they misinterpreted the history of inflation over the past century. I discussed this issue with Larry Swedroe in posts on X.  I respect Larry and have followed his work as he tirelessly explains evidence based investing to the masses. A Simple Example To explain the problem, let’s first begin with a simpler example.  So...

Scott Galloway uses a unique style in his book The Algebra of Wealth: A Simple Formula for Financial Security .  Rather than offer generic advice to choose a career that pays well, Galloway takes the tone of someone telling you privately what he really thinks of various career options, for example.  He takes a similar approach to other topics as well.  Readers may not agree with all of his advice, but they can’t say his opinions weren’t clear.   The book is divided into chapters on focus, good habits, and avoiding mistakes; choosing a career and developing skills; spending, saving, and budgeting; and investing.  The blunt commentary on choosing a career was the most interesting part of the book.   For those concerned that this is some sort of math book, it isn’t.  The few formulas in the book are mostly not intended to be taken literally.  For example, “focus + (stoicism x time x diversification),” and “value = (future income + terminal value) x d...

As we’ve learned in recent years, inflation can rise up and make life’s necessities expensive.  Despite the best efforts of central bankers to control inflation through the economic shocks caused by Covid-19, inflation rose significantly for nearly 3 years in both Canada and the U.S.   Uncertainty about future inflation is an important risk in financial planning, but most financial planning software treats inflation as far less risky than it really is.  This makes projections of the probability of success of a financial plan inaccurate.  Here we analyze the nature of inflation and explain the implications for financial planning. Historical inflation Over the past century, inflation has averaged 2.9% per year in both Canada and the U.S.(*)  However, the standard deviation of annual inflation has been 3.6% in Canada and 3.7% in the U.S.  This shows that inflation has been much more volatile than we became used to in the 2 or 3 decades before Covid-19 appeared...

Benjamin Graham is widely considered to be the “father” of value investing, the process of finding individual stocks whose businesses offer the prospect of future price gains while offering reasonable protection against future losses.  Graham co-founded Graham-Newman Corp. nearly a century ago.  Stock markets have changed drastically since then. Early in Graham’s investing career, his approach was to buy stock in companies that were out-of-favour and severely undervalued.  He described these methods in his 1934 book Security Analysis . But Graham’s investment methods were never static.  As Jason Zweig explained in Episode 75 of the Bogleheads on Investing Podcast : “People criticize Graham all the time for being old-fashioned, for having these formulaic techniques for valuing stocks, … and then people say these things are all out-moded.  Nobody invests like that any more.  Nobody should.  And that completely misses the mark for two reasons.  First...

Many people like to say that passive investing doesn’t exist.  However, these people make a living from active forms of investing and are just playing semantic games to distract us.  Active fund managers and advisors who recommend active strategies are the main people I see claiming that passive investing doesn’t exist, but what they say isn’t true. There is a continuum between passive and active investing; they are not absolute properties.  We can reasonably call an investment approach passive even if it involves some decisions, just as we can call a person thin even if their weight isn’t zero.  We may disagree on the exact threshold between passive and active investing, but the concept of passive investing still has meaning. By “passive investing,” most people mean some form of broadly-diversified index investing with minimal trading.  Although passive investing usually requires substantially less work than active investing, passive investors still have decisi...