Get new posts by email:
  

Mystery of the Missing Month of Savings

If you save $1000 per month and earn no interest, you’ll have $12,000 at the end of one year. What if this goes on for two years? You might naively think you’d have $24,000 saved, but an authoritative source says this isn’t right.

According to the Globe and Mail’s Pay Yourself First calculator, you’d only have $23,000 saved after two years of saving $1000 per month.  (As of 2016 Nov. 2, the Globe and Mail finally dropped this calculator from its web site.) To see this, punch in an annual salary of $100,000 with 0% for the salary increases and 0% rate of return, and set the “pay yourself” rate at 12%, with one year of saving. The result is a retirement fund of $12,000 as you would expect. Now bump it up to 2 years of saving. The retirement fund jumps to $23,000.

I’m not sure where the missing month goes, but apparently every year after your first year of saving you lose a month. After 3 years of saving you have $34,000, and after 10 years you have $111,000.

I first wrote about these surprising results almost 7 months ago. I received a message from the Globe and Mail saying “Thanks for drawing the problem to our attention. We are investigating.”  However, the calculator remained online for a long time.

<< Previous Post Next Post >>

Comments

  1. AnatoliNSeptember 11, 2013 at 8:45 AM

    And I thought I could trust G&M. Some leading financial newspaper :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael JamesSeptember 11, 2013 at 9:16 AM

      I suspect that the scramble to get a working business model for online content is all-consuming.

      Delete
  2. My Own AdvisorSeptember 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM

    I've found some other online calculators that are off, although I can't recall them off the top. Too bad they haven't fixed it yet.

    The G&M should have the same thing for a mortgage calculator, I would enjoying missing a payment :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael JamesSeptember 12, 2013 at 8:33 AM

      @Mark: Back when I had a mortgage my bank used to announce with great fanfare that I'd earned the right to skip a payment (with fine print saying I'd still owe the money and would be charged more interest). I'm guessing this isn't what you had in mind :-)

      Delete
  3. LifeInsuranceCanada.com Inc.September 12, 2013 at 8:20 AM

    I betcha they're measuring something at the beginning of each month or the end of each month - something simple like that.

    Years ago when I was developing and testing a mortgage calculator for my website I was testing it against the banks' website. I found one of the big 5 banks using American numbers in it's calculations. When I notified them (and provided the fix), they suggested that I visit a branch if I wanted a mortgage amortization schedule.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael JamesSeptember 12, 2013 at 8:34 AM

      @Glenn: You might have the explanation. But they seem to make the same mistake for every year which compounds the problem greatly.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Financial Lessons from Poker

Common advice about controlling spending is to track all your purchases and add them up each week or month. I believe that this is effective, but have been fuzzy on why it seems to work so well. Why can’t people just spend less without the constant reminder of how well they are doing? I got some insight on this question from, of all places, poker. For poker players there is a certain thrill to dragging in a pot of chips. The thrill is there whether it is a $1 pot or a $10 pot. The $10 pot gives a bigger thrill, but not 10 times bigger. Similarly, losing a $10 pot feels worse than losing a $1 pot, but not 10 times worse. This leads to some players playing in such a way that they maximize happiness by taking in many small pots, but losing some big ones. As long as they don’t count their dwindling chips, they can actually be happy playing this way. Counting your chips is a lot like adding up your spending at the end of the month to see what happened. You may feel good about ...
Read more

Even Dimensional Fund Advisors Struggles with Inflation Statistics

Inflation is a risk we have to face in financial planning, particularly in retirement.  We need to measure inflation risk correctly to be able to make reasonable financial plans.  The best guide we have to the future takes into account past inflation statistics.  But the field of statistics is full of subtleties, and even Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) can make mistakes. DFA creates good funds, and their advisors tend to do good work for their clients.  I’d prefer to find errors in the work of a less investor-friendly investment firm, but they provided a clear example to learn from.  They misapplied a statistical rule, and as a result, they misinterpreted the history of inflation over the past century. I discussed this issue with Larry Swedroe in posts on X.  I respect Larry and have followed his work as he tirelessly explains evidence based investing to the masses. A Simple Example To explain the problem, let’s first begin with a simpler example.  So...
Read more

A Misunderstanding About Taking CPP Early to Invest

Recently, Braden Warwick at PWL Capital created an excellent CPP calculator that we can all use.  One of the numbers this calculator reports is the IRR (Internal Rate of Return) you’ll get between your CPP contributions and the CPP pension you’ll collect.  Some financial advisors (but not Braden) decide it makes sense for their clients to take CPP as early as possible (age 60), and invest the proceeds.  Their reasoning is that they believe they can earn a higher return.  Here I explain why this logic compares the wrong returns. The return you’ll get on your CPP contributions depends on the contributions you and your employer have made and the benefits you’ll get.  These amounts depend on many factors about your life as well as some assumptions about the future.  Typically, the return people get on CPP is between inflation+2% and inflation+4%.  (However, it can go higher if you took time off work with a disability or to raise your children.  It al...
Read more

Archive

Show more